The 'talk origins' site is featured herehttp://talkorigins.org/
it lists 29 'proofs for Evolution' and seems to form a coherant picture that not only involves a 'nesting hierarchy' of species , but is even listing it's testabilities. In other words, they actually say things like "If our model is wrong, we would expect to find birds with mammary glands, or feathered mammals. We would also find mammals in the devonian and earlier rocks."
It seems strange that people like Dr Duane gish can put up no postitive and testable proof for Creationism. Now Ann Coulter is on record, on British TV in an interview with Jeremy Paxman as saying that "the evidence for evolution is sketchy."
In fact evolutionists lay out 29 pices of evidence from many fields that appear to interlock in a coheent pattern. they also attack the Global Flood theory with evidence of theiir own.
The only way creationists usually come back is to attack creationists - so, do we have any direct proof of creationism?
The 'Dinosaur blood' recently found is dealt with and refuted in the FAQ on end_creationism
I have posted about the upright tree trunks found at Mt. St. Helens, and those in coal bearing strata. I shall see what comes up, and post back.
I am curious to know if there are any scientific answers to the problems of predators.
Ok, lions have teeth and claws, but maybe are only eaters of carrion.
however, bees have stings, and porcupines have quills. Even peaceful honeybees, that spend their days gathering nectar, are kitted out wih stings.
then you have got mosquitoes and fleas that bite and suck blood.
was this created, or did it evolve?